Saturday, February 7, 2009

If people don't like smoke, can't they go elsewhere?

284>Or do anti-freedom people have to let government get involved?





If there is such a small percentage of places that let people smoke, why bother outlawing smoking those places?





If you think smoking is a risk- Don%26#039;t go to the place that allows smoking.





Are a rampage of people forcing this person to go to the bar on main street that allows smoking?





Why ban it in all public places???





If a worker that works with chemicals is worried about catching cancer, they have the right to work somewhere else.





And I%26#039;ve heard these stories.


People have caught lung cancer and died.


People have died from other things they shouldn%26#039;t do as well.


They don%26#039;t like the smell. It stinks up the cloths.


I realize that and it bothers some.


It doesn%26#039;t bother others though.





I think the anti-smoker campain needs to study on other things rather than smoking.





There is a risk. As in many choices we make. We don%26#039;t need mommy and daddy to tell us that anymore.
Reply:I find smoking to be unpleasant and offensive and I don%26#039;t care if my well-being and comfort interferes with your enjoyment of smoking. Tough. Smoke in your own home and leave public places free of it.
Reply:You find smoking unpleasant and offensive,but I bet you do not feel the same about alcohol.Why not tax and ban alcohol just the same as cigarettes? There are more people injured and killed by alcohol than by cigarettes.What about the other chemicals you breathe in from? Report It

Reply:A few centuries ago, the %26quot;natives%26quot; would smoke their weed and be called evil. It%26#039;s just that things come full circle. Centuries from now, people will say how stupid people were to ban smoking in public places, while they walk around with their iron lung attachments hung on their backs.

No comments:

Post a Comment