I don't drive but i smoke who pollutes the air more?

372>how do anti smokes justify jumping into their cars when they complain about my habit?


a ciggie might just might give you cancer but a car can kill in a second
Reply:I am in exactly same situation. I don%26#039;t drive neither.


There are more people that cause fatal accidents due to not concentrating on driving.





When was the last time that somebody was fataly injured by a lambert and butler??
Reply:a car pollutes more. but you can%26#039;t justify yourself smoking because of that! you are inhaling the smoke directly whilst a car is outdoors and it%26#039;s smoke quickly dissolves in the air and no-one breathes it.
Reply:A gun is no use without a bullet.
Reply:Yes cars kill but so do cigs. I have seen several close friends die from smoking related cancers and it isn%26#039;t pretty. Using one thing to justify another is the wrong approach.
Reply:smoking has no purpose.. so therefore is an unnessecary polutant!





i apologise fo rmy spelling, i am very tired
Reply:Anti smokers/pro drivers should be given a choice of spending an hour in a room with a smoker or an hour in a room with a car with its engine running. As for car fumes dissolving into the air...purleeze!
Reply:Right, well, I%26#039;ll make this simple.


I%26#039;m a non smoker but if you wanna smoke then that%26#039;s fine with me. Go for it. As long as smokers respect the fact that I won%26#039;t let them smoke in my car or my house then I really couldn%26#039;t care less if people smoke. Give and take really.


Everybody%26#039;s happy!
Reply:he he, i would rather spent an hour in a room with a smoker, smokers if you will, than with a car with its engine running.